At least QBL can be used for direct combat, it can be used for anything really. It's just not as good at sustaining as stock is. It can be used in way more situations than every other stickybomb launcher. Isn't the QBL way more versatile? It sacrifices base-DPS for flexibility. Originally posted by Toasty:Someone hasn’t been playing with the Scottish in a while, I see, claiming it’s good for stickyspamming. Compare that to scottish resistance which is only good for traps or vomiting over the objective, and good luck if you try using it for close-combat, and stock which is nowhere near as good when it comes to sticky sniping and dealing with chasers.
Someone hasn't been playing on payload and attack defense in a while I see. I've topscored by spamming with Scottish Resistance. My bad for not noticing it’s stats had been changed from the spam fest it used to be, but looking at its new stats I’ll maintain it is the worst sticky launcher, even if only because the other two real ones are so much better and versatile in 99% of cases. Someone hasn’t been playing with the Scottish in a while, I see, claiming it’s good for stickyspamming. Scottish Resistance even has higher fire rate and can have more active stickies at a time. QBL doesn't have the high clip size or the base damage to be considered as a spammy weapon while Stock and Scottish Resistance do. Even Scottish Resistance is more spammy, you can just spam it on objectives, payload, you don't have to aim as carefully with it as you do with QBL. If anything, QBL is one of the least spammiest stickybomb launchers for Demoman.
The spamming argument is here to explain why the Scottish is the objective best No. Originally posted by Toasty:It’s just as much as stock, but at least this one doesn’t have a smaller clip and damage penalty
0 kommentar(er)
